Health service delisting coming, Ontario minister says

When government takes the role of regulating our health, they eventually start running out of our money. Then they start to ration. Using control or people’s health to stay in power represents a low point in politics. Many Canadians seeking timely medical care because they are on a medical waiting list, or because they want affordable knee replacement surgery come to MediBid.

http://www.ottawacitizen.com/health/Health+service+delisting+coming+Ontario+minister+says/6053073/story.html

Health service delisting coming, Ontario minister says

Matthews won’t reveal what’s on the chopping block

By Lee Greenberg, Ottawa Citizen January 26, 2012
Ontario Health Minister Deb Matthews will lay out the province's action plan on health funding, which will include service delisting, on Monday.

Ontario Health Minister Deb Matthews will lay out the province’s action plan on health funding, which will include service delisting, on Monday.

Photograph by: Julie Oliver, The Ottawa Citizen, Ottawa Citizen

Ontarians should brace for fewer publicly funded health services as the province trims its $16-billion deficit.

Health Minister Deb Matthews issued the warning Wednesday that she is considering delisting an unknown number of services from OHIP.

“If there is not evidence to support a procedure or a test, we don’t want to pay for it,” Matthews told reporters.

She would not reveal what is on the chopping block, but she added that while some services will be delisted, other new ones will also be funded.

For example, the government now covers new childhood vaccines, because evidence shows they are effective. Other services, such as Vitamin D testing, have been delisted.

“The evidence doesn’t support universal Vitamin D testing,” Matthews said. “It does support testing people with specific health concerns.”

The minister will lay out the province’s “action plan” on health funding on Monday.

Ontario spends $47.1 billion on health and long-term care – roughly 38 per cent of its budget. Without serious reform, health spending is predicted to take up as much as 80 per cent of the budget by 2030, crowding out almost every other service.

A report recommending spending cuts and other reforms is in government hands and will be released in the coming weeks.

Its lead author, former TD Bank chief economist Don Drummond, wrote a report in November telegraphing some of his health recommendations.

Drummond says Ontario performs more caesarean sections per capita than most other jurisdictions, for example.

Asked about C-sections Wednesday, Matthews said data shows large geographic swings in the number of procedures being performed.

“What that tells me is that we’ve got some work to do to make sure everyone is practicing the highest quality medicine,” she said.

She did not comment when asked if the government would stop paying for planned caesarean sections.

Drummond has also cast aspersions on arthroscopic knee surgery, which, he has indicated, simply delays knee replacement for one year.

He has also said physicians are being paid too much to perform procedures that have become much simpler in recent years, such as cataract surgery and radiology.

Ontario’s Liberal government is no stranger to delisting.

In 2004, the province stopped funding biannual eye exams for all but children and seniors. The government also pulled funding for chiropractic and physical therapy services.

The government has forbidden Drummond from recommending any form of privatization.

Nevertheless, Drummond made it clear in a November report for the C.D. Howe Institute that universal public care is a fallacy in Ontario.

The public system covers medically necessary hospital and physician services and little else, he says.

Among the long list of services not covered are: out-of-hospital drugs, psychological counselling, community mental health services, nutrition advice, fertility treatment, ambulance services, addiction treatment, long-term care, eye care and dental care.

© Copyright (c) The Ottawa Citizen

Read more: http://www.ottawacitizen.com/health/Health+service+delisting+coming+Ontario+minister+says/6053073/story.html#ixzz1kcqhN8Sb

Share
Posted in Canadian Healthcare, Cost of Health Care Tagged , , |

Using Groupon to promote services? Beware legal risks – FiercePracticeManagement

This article is from Fierce Practice Management, and it makes a very interesting point regarding fee splitting, or the anti kick back laws. Fee Splitting is the practice where a medical professional splits their professional fees for a referral. In many industries commissions are a common way to pay a sales force, yet it is prohibited in medical care. At MediBid, there is no fee splitting, since the physicians pay a flat annual registration fee regardless of how many patients they see, and the patient pays a monthly registration fee for access to the marketplace.

In order to have full transparency, it is important to know if there is any fee splitting, or kick backs going on, so when purchasing medical care through a third party, don’t be afraid to ask if there is a kick back or referral fee included in the cost. Timely Medical Care is important, but so are transparency and quality.

Using Groupon to promote services? Beware legal risks – FiercePracticeManagement.

In an effort to boost sales and bolster word-of-mouth (or mouse) marketing, a number of practices have begun offering deep discounts on services through websites such as Groupon and Living Social. Typically, the discounts offer at least half off high-priced, self-pay services, such as teeth-whitening or Lasik surgery and are designed to lure patients into a practice so they’ll become repeat customers and possibly refer their friends. But with the trend still in its infancy, some attorneys warn that physicians offering deals through such sites could be breaking the law.

The primary risk to physicians is that they may run afoul of anti-kickback laws, which forbid health professionals from paying or giving anything of value to someone–including a website–for sending them a patient, explains an article in the Florida Sun Sentinel. With a typical Groupon promotion, for example, the website would reap about half of the revenue generated from a given offer. Therefore, the revenue split would vary depending on the volume of business, constituting a kickback.

To avoid this pitfall, David Harlow, an attorney from Newton, Mass., recently told American Medical News that physicians must ensure that the service is not covered by traditional or federally funded insurance. Even if it’s a federally covered individual paying for the treatment out of pocket and the physician is enrolled in a federally funded program, there could be legal risks, he warned.

And when it comes to private payers, many have stipulations in their contracts guaranteeing that they have the best price, the article said. In a worst-case scenario, the physician could be forced to offer all services at the reduced price offered on the group-coupon site, attorneys told amednews.

So far, although no states are known to punish medical professionals for online discounts, two medical boards in Oregon have banned dentists and chiropractors from giving Groupon-style discounts, the Sentinel reports. And while Medicare and the American Medical Association have taken no position on the issue, a number of national and local medical associations have warned members that there is still doubt as to whether such discounts are legal.

 

 

Share
Posted in Cost of Health Care, Fee Splitting Tagged , , , , , |

Obamacare prescription: ‘Emergency health army’

I don’t understand why we need a new para-military organization, but it’s in the bill. Funding a “Health Army”, will do nothing to make healthcare more affordable, and it is yet another example of why MediBid by applying economic principles of transparency and competition is a better solution than government using 16,000 new IRS agents, and a 17 million dollar army is a better solution.

Although the article below may be somewhat controversial, it makes a point.

http://www.ohiofreepress.com/tag/section-5210-of-hr-3590/

Obamacare prescription: ‘Emergency health army’

Public Heal Service LogoBy Chelsea Schilling
© 2010 WorldNetDaily

President Obama’s recently passed health-care reform legislation includes a surprise for many Americans – a beefing up of a U.S. Public Health Service reserve force and expectations that it respond on short notice to “routine public health and emergency response missions,” even involuntarily.

According to Section 5210 of HR 3590, titled “Establishing a Ready Reserve Corps,” the force must be ready for “involuntary calls to active duty during national emergencies and public health crises.”

The health-care legislation adds millions of dollars for recruitment and amends Section 203 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 204), passed July 1, 1944, during Franklin D. Roosevelt’s presidency. The U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps is one of the seven uniformed services in the U.S. However, Obama’s changes more than double the wording of the Section 203 and dub individuals who are currently classified as officers in the Reserve Corps commissioned officers of the Regular Corps.

The following is the previous wording of the act as of 2004, before Democrats passed the health-care legislation:


Wording of Section 203 of Public Health Service Act before Obamacare amendment

The U.S. Public Health Service website describes its commissioned corps as “an elite team of more than 6,000 full-time, well-trained, highly qualified public health professionals dedicated to delivering the nation’s public health promotion and disease prevention programs and advancing public health science.”

According to its mission page, officers of the commissioned corps may:

  • Provide essential public health and health care services to underserved and disadvantaged populations
  • Prevent and control injury and the spread of disease
  • Ensure that the nation’s food supply, drinking water, drugs, medical devices and environment are safe
  • Conduct and support cutting-edge research for the prevention, treatment and elimination of disease, health disparities and injury
  • Work with other nations and international agencies to address global health challenges
  • Provide urgently needed public health and clinical expertise in response to large-scale local, regional and national public health emergencies and disasters

Members are trained to respond to public health situations and national emergency events, such as natural disasters, disease outbreaks and terrorist attacks.

As stated in the health-care legislation, “The purpose of the Ready Reserve Corps is to fulfill the need to have additional Commissioned Corps personnel available on short notice (similar to the uniformed service’s reserve program) to assist regular Commissioned Corps personnel to meet both routine public health and emergency response missions.”

‘(b) Assimilating Reserve Corp Officers Into the Regular Corps- Effective on the date of enactment of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, all individuals classified as officers in the Reserve Corps under this section (as such section existed on the day before the date of enactment of such Act) and serving on active duty shall be deemed to be commissioned officers of the Regular Corps.’(c) Purpose and Use of Ready Research-

‘(2) USES- The Ready Reserve Corps shall–

‘(A) participate in routine training to meet the general and specific needs of the Commissioned Corps;’(B) be available and ready for involuntary calls to active duty during national emergencies and public health crises, similar to the uniformed service reserve personnel;

‘(C) be available for backfilling critical positions left vacant during deployment of active duty Commissioned Corps members, as well as for deployment to respond to public health emergencies, both foreign and domestic; and

‘(D) be available for service assignment in isolated, hardship, and medically underserved communities (as defined in section 799B) to improve access to health services.

‘(d) Funding- For the purpose of carrying out the duties and responsibilities of the Commissioned Corps under this section, there are authorized to be appropriated $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2014 for recruitment and training and $12,500,000 for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2014 for the Ready Reserve Corps.’

Commissioned officers of the ready reserve corps are appointed by the president, and commissioned officers of the regular corps are appointed by the president with the advice and consent of the Senate.

Robert Book, a senior research fellow in health economics at the Heritage Foundation, said the service has been around some time but is not well known.

In the past, its responsibilities have included work related to the National Institutes of Health, the Indian health service and providing physicians for Coast Guard operations, he said.

As first reported by WND during his campaign, Obama called for a “civilian national security force” July 2, 2008, in Colorado Springs, Colo.

“We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set,” he said. “We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”

WND also reported in January when a Rand Corporation report proposed the federal government create a rapid deployment “Stabilization Police Force” that would be tasked with “shaping an environment before a conflict” and restoring order in times of war, natural disaster or national emergency.

 

From WorldNet Daily at http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=132001

Share
Posted in Health Care News, Health Care Reform, Health Care Repeal, Health Law and Legislation, Obamacare, Politics Tagged , , , |

Expanding Medicaid Will Decrease Access to Care

http://www.aapsonline.org/index.php/site/article/expanding_medicaid_will_decrease_access_to_care/

Profit is a result of competition in the free market.  It is not an evil thing as the Occupy Wall Street people suggest.  As Dr. Eck states, when the free market is restored to medicine, more doctors can run practices offering fair prices.
MediBid offers a solution to escalating prices.  The reason that MediBid has saved consumers so much money is because “Medical care” is a product, and the physicians produce it, price it, and package it. There are no third party payers price fixing it behind the scenes.

Expanding Medicaid Will Decrease Access to Care

Expanding Medicaid Will Decrease Access to Care

Alieta Eck, M.D.

Jan 16, 2012

By: Alieta Eck, MD, President, AAPS

“The purpose of profit is to encourage competition,” said NJ gubernatorial candidate Bret Schundler. Too bad he didn’t win in 2001, as his free market approach to our economy would have dramatically enhanced prosperity in NJ. Instead, as private enterprise has declined, one in seven New Jerseyans is now on food stamps and Medicaid, dependent on the government for basic needs. Every NJ governor since 2001, including the current GOP darling Chris Christie, has cooperated with the federal government, accepting federal tax money and expanding Medicaid as prescribed.

Profit causes more people to supply a service or product. Increased supply causes competition, and the one who provides the best quality at the lowest price wins. This is the free market. The only impediment to a free market in medical care is government intervention.

Government run healthcare will prove this point dramatically, as demand will skyrocket and prices will be fixed. Once the physician realizes that he cannot turn a profit, or recoup his educational costs and overhead, he will slow down and retire early. Only the wealthy who are willing pay the going market price will be able to avail themselves of the best medical care in the world.

Government healthcare will expand the ranks of those covered under Medicaid, the program designed to “pay for” medical care for the poor. But Medicaid simply provides a huge bureaucracy to sign people up and shuffle papers. The payments to physicians are about 10 cents on the dollar, so most physicians do not enroll in Medicaid. The Medicaid program amounts to a fraud on the American taxpayer, squandering his hard-earned dollars for ¼ to ⅓ of the average state budget. If this expenditure results in a healthy population and true access to care, one might argue it is money well spent. But it is not.

We can see what ObamaCare will bring to the nation by looking at the results of RomneyCare, its prototype in Massachusetts. Romney promised that people would all be “insured” enabling everyone to see the doctor in his office, sparing the taxpayer from having to pay a more expensive emergency room bill. But as more people attempt to avail themselves of their new found “coverage,” they find that they cannot find a physician who is willing and able to see them. The average wait is now two months, so they still go to the emergency room.

This is not the worst of it. In an extraordinary study from Ohio, Medicaid recipients had worse cancer survival rates than people with no insurance at all. Could it be that the bureaucratic paperwork and low Medicaid fee schedule provides a barrier rather than access to care? An uninsured person who is willing to set up a payment plan, or who expresses true gratitude for donated services, does better than a patient with a Medicaid card.

The purpose of insurance is to protect one’s assets from sudden depletion in the event of a major loss. The poor presumably do not have assets to protect. So instead of insurance, they need a place to go when they find themselves ill and without funds to pay. In 1965, before Medicaid was enacted, hospitals had clinics where physicians donated their time to help the poor.

If we restore the free market to medicine, more primary care physicians will be able to set up practices where patients can pay a fair price for medical care. Philanthropy, hospitals and churches can set up non-government free clinics where the poor is able to access medical care when they become ill. Retiring baby boomers can form an army of volunteers in their communities. An innovative plan can be for the state to provide true medical malpractice protection for the entire practice of the physician who volunteers four hours a week in such a clinic. This will change everything and result in a booming economy as Medicaid will diminish and those huge sums will revert back to the taxpayers.

New Jersey and Kansas are preparing to draft laws that will make this happen. The states might need to defy the new federal legislation and may be forced to decline federal funds. But state budgets will be balanced and prosperity will result.

We simply must not allow Government Healthcare to expand the failed Medicaid program.


Alieta Eck, MD, President of AAPS http://www.aapsonline.org/index.php/site/article/message_from_aaps_president_alieta_eck_m.d/ graduated from the Rutgers College of Pharmacy in NJ and the St. Louis School of Medicine in St. Louis, MO. She studied Internal Medicine at Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital in New Brunswick, NJ and has been in private practice with her husband, Dr. John Eck, MD in Piscataway, NJ since 1988. She has been involved in health care reform since residency and is convinced that the government is a poor provider of medical care. She testified before the Joint Economic Committee of the US Congress in 2004 about better ways to deliver health ca re in the United States. In 2003, she and her husband founded the Zarephath Health Center, a free clinic for the poor and uninsured that currently cares for 300-400 patients per month utilizing the donated services of volunteer physicians and nurses. Dr. Eck is a long time member of the Christian Medical Dental Association and in 2009 joined the board of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons. In addition, she serves on the board of Christian Care Medi-Share, a faith based medical cost sharing Ministry. She is a member of Zarephath Christian Church and she and her husband have five children, one in medical school in NJ.

Share
Posted in Common Sense Health Care Solutions, Cost of Health Care, Economics, Free market medicine, Health (taking care of yourself), Health Care News, Insurance Tagged , |

Employers must enter value of healthcare on W-2 starting this year

Starting this year (2012), the value of employer sponsored health plans must be reported on employee’s W-2 forms. Many plans will be subject to a 40% tax, making healthcare even less affordable. Many will be better off dropping coverage and payng as they go, using a site such as MediBid.

IRS Posts W-2 Health Reporting Guidance | LifeHealthPro.

IRS Posts W-2 Health Reporting Guidance

260
President Obama signs PPACA. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File) President Obama signs PPACA. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has given more advice about how employers, benefit plan administrators and others should go about applying the new Form W-2 health benefits cost reporting requirements.

Employers do have to include the cost of any supplemental health benefits, such as cancer insurance, that they pay for, but they do not have to include the cost of supplemental health benefits that the employees pay for with after-tax dollars, IRS officials say in IRS Notice 2012-9.

IRS also have spelled out the reporting rules for flexible spending accounts (FSAs).

The W-2 reporting requirements were created by Section 6051(a)(14) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (PPACA).

Employers use Form W-2 to record payments to employees.

PPACA is supposed to add a Cadillac plan tax in 2018. The 40% tax will apply to health plan value over a specified threshold.

To implement the provision, and to give federal policymakers more information about expenditures on group health benefits, the IRS is asking for voluntary reports on group health expenditures on the 2011 W-2 and will be requiring employers to provide group health expenditure reports on the 2012 W-2.

Benefits advisors have wondered how hospital indemnity insurance, critical illness insurance, FSAs and other health benefits other than plain vanilla  major medical coverage might fit into the new reporting system.

Officials say in the answer to the 37th question that employers must include the cost of fixed indemnity coverage in the health benefits cost total reported on the W-2.

“An employer is required to include in the aggregate reportable cost reported on Form W-2 the cost of coverage provided under hospital indemnity or other fixed indemnity insurance, or the cost of coverage only for a specified disease or illness, if the employer makes any contribution to the cost of coverage that is excludable under Section 106 [of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC)] or if the employee purchases the policy on a pre-tax basis under [an IRC] Section 125 cafeteria plan,” officials say.

In response to the 38th question, officials say an employer need not report the cost of hospital indemnity or other fixed indemnity coverage “if those benefits are offered as independent, noncoordinated benefits and if the payment for those benefits is includable in the employee’s gross income.”

“To the extent the employer merely provides the opportunity for employees to purchase an independent, noncoordinated fixed indemnity policy and the employee pays the full amount of the premium with after-tax dollars, the cost of coverage provided under that policy is not required to be reported on Form W-2,” officials say.

The Employers Council on Flexible Compensation (ECFC), Washington, and other groups have

Share
Posted in Cost of Health Care, Health Care Taxes, Obamacare Tagged , , , |

Breaking the Waiting List Silence | thepatientfactor.com

Many say that the government needs to control healthcare. They say that the government is the only entity with enough compassion to make decisions which regular people are too stupid to make. Many Canadians are too afraid to speak up lest the be “fired” by their doctor. In this system, only the politicians win, because they get to use the control of healthcare as a carrot/stick.

Breaking the Waiting List Silence | thepatientfactor.com.

Breaking the Waiting List Silence

I know how difficult it can be for a patient trying to navigate our public health care system in search of access to high quality care or some accountability for the lack thereof. I can only imagine how difficult it must be for the doctors, nurses and other health care providers forced to work within the limits of this system.

A special boy from British Columbia named Walid is now recovering from surgery in a hospital south of the border. It’s a surgery he could not access in the Canadian health care system because of waiting lists that are two or more years. Walid’s mother Debbie, who is also a nurse, worked tirelessly to bring attention to his case before making the decision to leave the country to seek medical care. You can help break the waiting list silence by watching Walid’s story and passing on its message “No more waiting”.

Share
Posted in Canadian Healthcare, Obamacare, Politics Tagged , , , , , |

Direct primary care and medical loss ratio will impact health insurers

“You have to pass the bill so you can see what’s in it”…Nancy Pelosi

Direct primary care and medical loss ratio will impact health insurers.

Direct primary care and medical loss ratio will impact health insurers

by | in Policy |

With my extensive health care background, many people have asked for my opinion during the health reform debate. My response has been that the only way to really “reform” the system is to blow it up and start over, which isn’t politically feasible.

After delving deeper into the current legislation, I believe that we are going to see something close to a “blow up” ; something that isn’t being predicted by the pundits who know little of the inner-workings of health care.

Two portions of the Health legislation have received little attention yet will have a huge effect on bending the cost curve: 1. Medical Loss Ratio (MLR); 2. Direct Primary Care (aka “Medical Homes”).

MLR requires that insurance companies spend at least 80 to 85 percent of their collected premiums on medical services, while the Direct Primary Care provision will offer an affordable alternative that by-passes insurance companies altogether. Taken together, these two provisions could have a long term effect that is likely to be devastating to traditional health insurance companies.

Regardless of the legislation, people will continue business as usual until people realize there’s a better way as most believe traditional health insurance is the only option. Fortunately there is a better approach. Let me explain the two components of the new law that pack a potent punch. The first is the new “Medical Loss Ratio” (MLR) minimum requirement. The second is allowing flat-fee direct primary care practices, a form of the patient-centered medical homes that the health law initiated pilots around, to compete within the state-based insurance exchanges. These so-called Direct Primary Care models have a membership model that isn’t insurance and thus avoid 40% or more of the costs associated with insurance that don’t help patient well-being. They must be coupled with a high deductible “wrap around” policy to be in the exchanges.

Medical loss ratio will drive insurance companies to spike rates or opt out

The new law requires health insurers, starting in 2011, to spend at least 80 to 85 percent of the premiums they collect on medical services or activities that improve the quality of care or else they have to rebate money back to consumers. (That percentage is the MLR.) The remainder can be allocated to administration or profits that don’t benefit patients (e.g., overhead, salaries, advertising).

From the insurers’ standpoint to make this requirement, when they may be operating at a 65% MLR (common in the individual and small business market), the logical response will be to either jack up their rates or opt out of serving that end of the market. [Note that the large group market is closer to the target already.] It’s not hard to imagine that a small business or individual will look for an alternative if they are faced with the 50% rate increase we’ve begun to see when some of the new provisions kick in and notification of new rates begin. The better alternative for the consumer is Direct Primary Care.

Direct primary care can lower costs by 40% or more

Allowing for Direct Primary Care in the new law is the only element that I believe can actually bend the cost curve, as it removes 40+% of the cost out of the equation. Previously, that has gone to insurance overhead and profits. A relatively little-known provision in the law creates an affordable new choice for individuals and businesses by allowing flat-fee direct primary care practices to compete within the state-based insurance exchanges. This is where many Americans and small businesses will be able to shop for health coverage beginning in 2014 although there’s no need to wait until then from a consumer perspective.

This provision enables Americans to elect a more affordable health care option compared to traditional insurance plans — an alternative in which patients and/or employers pay a flat monthly fee directly to a primary care provider for all primary and preventive care, chronic disease management and care coordination throughout the entire health care system. Under the new law, a flat-fee direct primary care medical home membership can be bundled with a new, lower-cost “wrap-around” insurance plan that covers unpredictable and expensive services outside its scope, such as specialist care, hospital stays or emergency room visits. Not unlike a health club membership, many of the direct primary care practices allow unlimited use. Further, since primary care providers don’t have to spend so much time billing, they are able to spend far more time with their patients (30-60 minute appointments vs the 8 minute appointment common in Fee-for-Service.

Today, flat-fee practices offer affordable, high-quality health care at up to 50 percent less than the cost of traditional insurance, even when combined with a lower-cost “wrap-around” insurance plan. Benefits of direct primary care membership vary by provider, but typically include many of the following:

  • Unhurried 30- to 60-minute office visits
  • No limits for pre-existing conditions
  • No deductibles or co-pays
  • Open 7 days per week, with 24 hour cell phone and email access to a physician
  • Low, predictable monthly fees plus savings on third-party wrap-around insurance plans
  • On-site x-ray, laboratory and “first-fill” prescription drug dispensary
  • All routine care including vaccinations, routine blood tests, women’s health services, pediatric care, on-site procedures and ongoing management of chronic

When you start with a situation where two of the three parties (the patient and primary care physician) involved with a critical transaction are confused or unhappy and the cost to the consumer of that service is going up 20-30% every year, it is ripe for disruption. Talk to virtually any primary care provider and they will tell you how challenging their professional lives have become. This has led many to leave their practices in record numbers and fewer going into the field out of Med School. Most still love the patient interaction side of the equation but are extremely frustrated with how insurance has taken away their freedom to practice as they believe is best for their patients. Some physicians operating in this model describe how they felt they were only using 40% of their medical training in the hamster-wheel model so common in fee-for-service practices.

To understand just how convoluted our health payment system is today, it helps to draw an analogy. What if homeowner’s insurance was like health insurance and was used for regular house upkeep such as having an appliance serviced. Each time we had an appliance serviced, it would require the same inspection, approval, paperwork, and billing hassles that we endure after a fire or major incident at our home. When you had the appliance guy come, he wouldn’t be able to tell you how much it was going to cost. Worse, he wouldn’t even know until he found out whether you were an entrepreneur or worked for a larger employer. If you happened to not work for a large employer, you would likely pay 30% or more than if you’d worked for a large employer since they get price breaks. Home contractors would spend an extraordinary amount of time filling out forms and negotiating reimbursement for every appliance serviced. The overall cost of homeowner’s maintenance would increase exponentially to cover the business overhead. Fewer Americans would be able to afford homeowner’s insurance, laying the ground work for a national crisis. Sound crazy? This is how it America health insurance works today.

When faced with a 50% increase in premium costs for a model they aren’t particularly satisfied with, it’s not hard to imagine individuals and employers moving en masse to a model that not only costs less but delivers a dramatically higher level of service. As a result, the MLR combined with Direct Primary Care is likely to blow a gigantic hole in insurance companies’ business.

Dave Chase is a health care consultant who previously worked at Microsoft as Worldwide Healthcare Industry Director and Managing Director for Industry Marketing & Relations for the Digital Media industry, and was a senior consultant with Accenture’s Healthcare Practice.  He can be reached on Twitter @chasedave.

Share
Posted in Cost of Health Care, Economics, Medical Loss Ratio, Obamacare Tagged , , |

Two patients fighting C. difficile die in C.B. | The Chronicle Herald

When one entity (government) is the same entity that funds, regulates, and overseas hospitals, there exists a possibility for a conflict of interest, which can lead to needless deaths.

Two patients fighting C. difficile die in C.B. | The Chronicle Herald.

Two patients fighting C. difficile die in C.B.

January 6, 2012 – 9:09pm By SELENA ROSS

Two patients at a Cape Breton hospital that is fighting an outbreak of Clostridium difficile have died.

Though both patients tested positive for the bacteria, neither is thought to have died from the outbreak, said Cape Breton Health Authority spokesman Greg Boone.

One died of a C.difficile infection acquired outside the Cape Breton Regional Hospital while the other, who picked up the bacteria at the hospital, died of other causes, he said.

Nine other patients at the hospital are ill with hospital-acquired C.difficile.

The outbreak is expected to last several more weeks at least, Boone said.

“We’re holding our own,” he said.

“What we know from the previous outbreak is that we will see that a number of inpatient cases could rise and fall over periods of time, and that’s not uncommon.”

Two units at the Sydney hospital, each with three! infected patients, are !following strict visitor and staff protocols meant to limit the potential spread of the bacteria.

Children may not visit and only one family member is allowed to see each patient at a time, after donning gloves and gowns, said the hospital in a release.

The three other infected patients are scattered between two or three other units that aren’t limiting visits in the same way, said Boone.

The hospital has taken a close look at what lapses allowed a second outbreak of C.difficile to occur within a year, he said.

Experts were recently brought in from Infection Prevention Control and Prevention Nova Scotia and other health authorities.

One of their findings was that bedpans and commodes were sometimes emptied improperly into toilets in the bathrooms of shared patient rooms, Boone said.

“They should be emptied in … a soiled linen room or whatever, where there is a hopper (steel disposal unit) and a drain designed for emptying that type of waste,” he said.

The hospital is asking everyone in the hospital, including patients and visitors, to be extra vigilant.

“It’s a team effort,” said Boone. “We ask for their help because we can’t do this alone as an organization.”

(sross@herald.ca)

Share
Posted in Canadian Healthcare, Hospital Management, Hospital Safety Tagged , , , , |

Ways and Means Goes After AARP

Two years ago they wanted to have a “seat at the table”. They endorsed the ACA to get that seat. Now it seems that they are actually the main course at that dinner.

Ways and Means Goes After AARP | LifeHealthPro.

Ways and Means Goes After AARP

138
(AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin) (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

Three House Ways and Means Committee Republicans say an AARP affiliate has control over the pricing and marketing of the AARP-endorsed Medicare supplement (Medigap) insurance policies sold by a unit of UnitedHealth Group Inc.

The affiliate, AARP Services Inc., Washington, also oversees the AARP-UnitedHealth Medigap marketing campaigns, and it oversees and monitors the agent certification process for the program, the Ways and Means Republicans say.

“ASI has consultation, review and consent rights related to any proposed plan design changes including but not limited to, annual budgets, premium levels and rates, and sales and distribution plans,” the lawmakers say in a letter about the AARP Medigap program that was sent to Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Commissioner Douglas Shulman.

AARP Services can review and modify UnitedHealth Medigap contracts with other vendors when the value of a contract exceeds $250,000, and the annual incentive program for senior executives at UnitedHealth, Minnetonka, Minn. (NYSE:UNH), depends in part on UnitedHealth’s success at meeting AARP and AARP Services goals, the lawmakers say.

The lawmakers – Rep. Wally Herger, R-Calif., the chairman of the panel’s health subcommittee; Rep. Charles Boustany Jr., R-La., the chairman of the panel’s oversight committee; and Rep. Dave Reichert, R-Wash., a committee member – focused in a hearing earlier this year on allegations that AARP is more heavily involved in insurance distribution than a nonprofit organization ought to be.

Herger has argued that AARP supports the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (PPACA) because AARP Services will profit from PPACA.

Representatives for AARP were not immediately available for comment. In the past, AARP executives have denied Herger’s allegations and said that they support PPACA because they believe that PPACA will eliminate provisions in the current program that, they say, subsidize coverage for Medicare Advantage plan enrollees at the expense of people who enroll in the traditional Medicare program and buy Medigap coverage.

The lawmakers say they came up with the information about the relationship between AARP, AARP Services and UnitedHealth in the new letter recently, by getting the “opportunity to review three redacted contracts” that were signed in January 2008 and are still in effect.

“These contracts suggest that AARP’s relationship with United is much more than agreement to license the AARP name,” the Ways and Means Republicans say.

The lawmakers say the UnitedHealth contracts and other documents filed in court in connection with a hearing aid company bankruptcy “seem to suggest a pattern of business partnerships and activities that permit AARP to engage in for-profit businesses under the cover of its tax-exempt status,” the lawmakers say.

Share
Posted in Obamacare, Politics Tagged , |

No ‘Health Care’? – HUMAN EVENTS

No ‘Health Care’? – HUMAN EVENTS.

Thomas Sowell

No ‘Health Care’?

by Thomas Sowell
09/04/2007

 

How did I manage? The same way everybody else managed: I went to doctors and I paid them directly, instead of paying indirectly through taxes.

This was all before politicians gave us the idea that the things we could not afford individually we could somehow afford collectively through the magic of government.
When my jaw was broken, I was treated in an emergency room and was given a bill for $50 — which was like a king’s ransom to me at the time, 1949. But I paid it off in installments over a period of months.

Like most young people, I was lucky enough not to have any heavy-duty medical expenses that would have required major operations or a long hospital stay.

That is still true for most young people today, which is why many people in their twenties do not choose to pay for medical insurance, even when they can afford it.

They know that, in an emergency, they can always go to an emergency room. And today the idea that you ought to pay for that out of your own pocket is considered almost quaint in some quarters.

It is not uncommon — especially in California, with its large illegal immigrant population — for hospitals to have to shut down because so few people pay for the emergency room care they receive.

There are, of course, people with huge medical bills that they cannot possibly pay. Believe it or not, that also happened back before the modern welfare state.

Some hospitals — whether public or private — could absorb such costs, with the help of donors. There were people with polio living in iron lungs, which is why rich and poor alike gave money to the March of Dimes.

But that is very different from hospitals being stiffed every day by emergency room users whose only emergency is that they want to keep their money to spend on fun, instead of on doctors.

The biggest of the big lies in the “health care” hype is that a lack of insurance means a lack of medical care. The second biggest lie is that health care and medical care are the same thing.

Doctors cannot stop you from ruining your health in a hundred different ways, so statistics on everything from infant mortality to AIDS are not proof of a need for government to take over medical treatment.

Few people show the slightest interest in what has actually happened in countries with government-controlled medical care.

We are apparently supposed to follow those countries’ example without asking about the months that people in those countries spend on waiting lists for medical treatments that Americans get just by picking up a phone and making an appointment.

It is amazing how many people seem uninterested in such things as why so many doctors in Britain are from Third World countries with lower medical standards — or why people from Canada come to the United States for medical treatment that they could get cheaper at home.

Government price controls on pharmaceutical drugs are more of the same illusion of something for nothing.

People who are urging us to follow other countries that control the prices of medications seem uninterested in the fact that those countries depend on the United States to create new drugs, after they destroyed incentives to do so in their own countries.

Since it takes more than a decade to create a new drug, a politician can be elected president by hyping price controls on drugs, spend eight years in the White House, and be living in retirement before people start to notice that we no longer get the kinds of new medications that successively conquered deadly diseases in the past.

Share
Posted in Canadian Healthcare, Cost of Health Care, Economics, Free market medicine, Health (taking care of yourself), Health Care Reform, Health Care Repeal, Insurance Tagged , , |
Bulk Email Sender