Profit: Not Just a Motive | The Freeman | Ideas On Liberty

Before blaming the profit motive for the problems in the industry, critics might want to look at the ways in which existing government programs like Medicare and Medicaid, the interpretation of tort laws, and regulations such as those that limit who can practice what sorts of medicine might lead firms and professionals to engage in behavior that is profitable but unbeneficial to consumers. Labeling the profit motive as the source of the problem enables the critics to ignore the really difficult questions about how institutions, policies, and laws affect the profit-seeking incentives of producers and how that profit-seeking behavior translates into outcomes. Placing the blame on the profit motive without qualification simply overlooks the Smithian question of whether better institutions would enable the profit motive to generate better results and whether current policies or regulations are the source of the problem because they guide the profit motive in ways that produce the very problems the critics identify.

Placing blame for social problems on the profit motive is also easy if critics offer no alternative. What should be the basis for determining how resources are allocated if not in terms of profit-seeking behavior under the right set of institutions? How should people be motivated if not by profit? Often this question is just ignored, as critics are merely interested in casting blame.

What critics of the profit motive almost never ask is how, in the absence of prices, profits, and other market institutions, producers will be able to know what to produce and how to produce it. The profit motive is a crucial part of a broader system that enables producers and consumers to share knowledge in ways that other systems do not.

Profit: Not Just a Motive | The Freeman | Ideas On Liberty.

Here’s an important point that too many people don’t understand: profits aren’t just about rewards, they’re about knowledge. And losses are less about punishment and more about moving resources (including human effort) into areas where it will be more productive.

Lately I’ve been hearing political discussions of whether we should use more nurse-practitioners. Frankly, this shouldn’t be a political discussion. Politics aggregates opinions (poorly, I might add), while the market aggregates knowledge. Only the market can allow people to balance their desire for cheaper care with their desire to see someone with greater training.

Leave a Reply


Be sure to include your first and last name.

If you don't have one, no problem! Just leave this blank.